Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles.  https://zenwriting.net/tightseagle17/what-lengths-can-you-move-from-a-5g-portable-tower-without-becoming-unsafe  look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds


If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed.  https://notes.io/qNzW5  do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For  what is a safe distance from a cell tower , co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.